On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:48 PM, David Lambert <d...@lambsys.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 03:37 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Lambert <d...@lambsys.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Mainly due to some frustrations around opencv Python support in Angstrom,
>>> I
>>> am investigating switching to the Debian distribution. I have followed
>>> Robert Nelson's excellent tutorials and scripts, but need some guidance
>>> in
>>> adding my own kernel modules and device trees. I have already
>>> successfully
>>> built them under Angstrom/bitbake, but cannot determine the preferred or
>>> "correct" workflow for Debian. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> What kernel modules/device tree's do you need enabled?
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
> These are modules/dts that I have written to support a UPS/watchdog cape I
> am developing. They are building and working fine with the 3.8 Angstrom
> kernel using the attached bitbake recipe. My question is what are the
> magical incantations I need to build these outside the kernel tree? I
> suspect there is a "correct" way to do this under Debian, rather than me
> re-inventing a wheel.

Well, the best option is to write a patch against:
https://github.com/beagleboard/kernel/tree/3.8
and then i'll merge it into both tree's and push out a new
debian/ubuntu kernel build. .;)  So everyone get's the patch and
supports your new cape out of the box...

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to