I believe that PRUSpeak(https://github.com/deepakkarki/pruspeak/) makes use 
of remoteproc. I haven't made the transition yet, but I'm definitely 
curious about it. The complexity of implementing remoteproc seems much, 
much greater than using UIO or /dev/mem mapping. What is the benefit of 
using remoteproc over the other methods?

On Friday, September 12, 2014 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Cedric Malitte wrote:
>
>
>
> Le vendredi 12 septembre 2014 04:11:18 UTC-4, Jon E a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone know of example code that's using the newer remoteproc interface? 
>> Also, is there a way to convert pasm binary files to elf format for the 
>> firmware loader?
>>
>> Would like to play around with the latest 3.14 TI kernel, but haven't 
>> been able to find much info on the PRU side..
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jon
>>
>> As I read here 
> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/PRU-ICSS_Getting_Started_Guide
> There are some examples included in the SDK.
>
> I'm downloading it to check that, but for now i'm still using the old 
> patch method to enable pruss :)
>
> Regards,
> Cedric 
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to