One of these? http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Sitara_ARM_MPU_SOM/SBC
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:11 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > err, sorry did not mean to say system on a chip, meant to say a tiny SBC. > As in something a good bit smaller than the BBB > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:02 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Didn't one user of the community make / build an SoC based on the BBB - >> Last year ? Something with a DIMM like interface, >> and minimal pin-outs. For like ~$35 ? >> >> Anyway I'm having a hard time understanding how one could *try* and >> compare a $9 garbage board that has a fraction of the >> intrinsic value of the X15. Dual core A15 ( at 1.5Ghz ? ), multi PRUs / >> DSPs, 2GB ddr, PCIe, and SATA. With a boat load of >> other IO. >> >> It's not that I would / could not find value in a $9 garbage board. It's >> that feature wise the two do not even belong in the same solar >> system - figuratively speaking. Passed that, I know I am not alone in the >> world in understanding that while something may be >> inexpensive cash wise, you usually end up paying for that mistake through >> hard work trying to make such a thing work. >> >> So in the context of being bitten once too many times - I guess I am >> dead. As I'd rather work with something that is "proven" How does >> that saying go ? Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to >> repeat it ? Works for me . . . >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Gerald Coley <ger...@beagleboard.org> >> wrote: >> >>> @Morgaine >>> >>> Yes I can certainly crank out 25 or 30 more versions of the BBB with all >>> sort of combinations. If you drop HDMI you will save $3. Yes, that's >>> right $3. So we go from $55 to $52. >>> >>> As long as someone agrees to buy 25,000 of each it would make sense to >>> do. Otherwise, the price goes up because we are building smaller quantities. >>> >>> Gerald >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Gerald Coley <ger...@beagleboard.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Not sure on the single core board. Depends on how my therapy sessions >>>> go on recovering from this one. >>>> >>>> It would be possible to provide the same amount of memory, but it just >>>> 32b one bus instead of two. >>>> DSPs are half. >>>> I believe the PRUs are the same. >>>> PCIe is only one lane instead of two. >>>> >>>> Original plan was for a different a PMIC, but I don't know if I have >>>> the guts to go through that again or not. >>>> >>>> Gerald. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:01 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> it will have* -> No idea where "hald" came from. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:00 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Gerald, >>>>>> >>>>>> So you mentioned a less expensive board with a single core processor. >>>>>> Is this the only difference, or do you think there will be other >>>>>> differences too ? Mostly I'm just wondering if that board would have the >>>>>> same amount of ddr, which I'm hoping it will. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we also assume since that processor will be single core it would >>>>>> have hald the PRU's, and DSPs ? Or no ? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' < >>>>>> elena.valha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-05-29 at 12:15:02 -0700, rh_ wrote: >>>>>>> > On Thu, 28 May 2015 20:25:58 -0400 >>>>>>> > Chris Morgan <chmor...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > I've read about that board as well. Their kickstarter FAQ doesn't >>>>>>> > > indicate anything about being a loss leader, but claims that >>>>>>> they are >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > It's a loss leader, maybe they just don't know it yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wonder if it's still a loss leader when you count the higher than >>>>>>> average postage rates >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Elena ``of Valhalla'' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gerald >>>> >>>> ger...@beagleboard.org >>>> http://beagleboard.org/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Gerald >>> >>> ger...@beagleboard.org >>> http://beagleboard.org/ >>> >>> -- >>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
