I am not sure about this but I think I read somewhere that QT 5.3.x does not support the "qws" anymore. I run QT 5.3.1 with -platform linuxfb only and it works. I did compile with eglfs but have not been able to get that to work either.

Have you finally solved this problem? If so, could you please give some advice how to fix this problem? I am stuck in the same place right now. Trying to run an example after cross compiling qt for BBB.

On Sunday, 20 December 2015 12:39:38 UTC+1, bremenpl wrote:
I tried the first hint:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# ./ImpedanceManager -qws -platform eglfs
libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
Could not initialize egl display
Aborted

Theb second:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# DISPLAY=:0 ./ImpedanceManager -qws
No protocol specified
QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
Aborted


Is there something more I should specify?

W dniu 2015-12-20 o 08:49, Maxim Podbereznyy pisze:
Try it this thus way:

DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws

19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь "Bremenpl" <brem...@gmail.com> написал:
I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage manager.

On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne <john...@gmail.com> wrote:

i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the "-platform eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.

Regards,
John




On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl <brem...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything there and it took ages but it works .

Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do it like this because thw gui is really really slow.

On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne <john...@gmail.com> wrote:

For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice:

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7 processors. I don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I know Robert had looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so perhaps he can give his input here.

Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15 with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe interface, etc.

Regards,
John




On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans <yyr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.

https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd have to ask someone who has one how well they think it would work as a build board. RObert might know, as his Debian build guide also includes this board too I believe.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans <yyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans <yyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
The new board is armv7. Positively.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl <brem...@gmail.com> wrote:
Okay, thank . I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with quad cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build system for the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that new nVidia ARM board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably be a much better choice if cost is not a problem.

By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to ask him.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl <brem...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc with lxqt image linked by Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. I thought there would be qt installed and all. Am I missing something again?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded systems specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 15-20 years ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed in roughly half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could buy a board for $239 after working roughly half a day.

Now take into account that figuring out how to cross compile something like this is a serious headache, and often takes days, if not weeks to get right . . .

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bremenpl <brem...@gmail.com> wrote:
So if I understand correctly, I should have a second board that is more powerfull than beagle just to compile the code for beagle?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:26, William Hermans pisze:
I cant change the board right now, it has to be BeagleBone Black. Thats why I need to build on my host. Did you succed on installing QT5.1 and deploying it to BeagleBone Black? Maybe I should use it instead of 4.8.6 if its easier?

No one was saying change boards. Use the same board, but use a faster, more powerful ARM board to compile native ARM executable. The reasons are simple. No need to mess with cross compiling, which in many cases is messy, and sometimes near impossible.

You don't think Robert spends days, or weeks compiling packages do you ? But why don't we ask Robert. Robert, hey what percentage of the packages you build are compiled native to ARM, from some sort of beefy ARM board? I'm guessing nearly 100% if not 100% but . . .

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bremenpl <brem...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ahh., thats the way, you are right...
Thank you for all the support guys, I really mean it! Hope to get it working in a while if i wont fall asleep on my desk!



On December 14, 2015 11:55:59 PM John Syne <john...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Dec 14, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Bremenpl <brem...@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay guys, atm I am donwloading the lxqt image. AT first I will try to open the app on the BeagleBone Black itself. But after that works I need to figure out how to remote debug while building on beagle instead of cross compile on host.
Could you please onl

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to