OK so further checking, the listing in fstab does not seem to work. I'll
have to look into it when I get some free time.

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:42 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> quick worklog, but do note that I used a 4GB USB thumb drive to make
> things easier( so as not to have to format an existing USB hard drive ).
> http://pastebin.com/1zEFAYM3
>
> Do note that the only thing you need to fstab is:
>
>
>
> *UUID=1808bf31-3313-44e6-b063-2d4d81f02e9e none swap sw,pri=5 0 0*
> But do keep in mind your UUID will be different.
>
> Anyway, I'll probably write up a blog on this to have a link for
> additional queries. But It'll probably at minimum take me a few hours to
> get around to it.
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:14 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> *The OP said he has algorithms already written in Python so I was
>>> pointing out that if he need to improve performance, it is easy to do.
>>> Anyway, you know that most build systems like Openembedded, yocto, etc, all
>>> use Python? If it was so slow, they wouldn’t be using it. Now I’m wondering
>>> why they just don’t write the whole thing in C ;-)*
>>> *Regards,*
>>>
>> *John*
>>
>> I kind of like the idea behind interfaces in C for Python . . . I just
>> don't like Python. So John, if you read my posts above you'd know that I
>> know that Python is a requirement for building Linux systems. Python Perl,
>> and C are all required. I said "Ruby" above, but meant Perl. In my mind
>> they're both equivalent( garbage, but useful I guess ), hence my mistake
>> Anyway . . .
>>
>> There are machine learning libraries for C . . . No idea if a specific
>> one out there would fit the bill for the OP though. Not my job to look into
>> all that.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, John Syne <john3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The OP said he has algorithms already written in Python so I was
>>> pointing out that if he need to improve performance, it is easy to do.
>>> Anyway, you know that most build systems like Openembedded, yocto, etc, all
>>> use Python? If it was so slow, they wouldn’t be using it. Now I’m wondering
>>> why they just don’t write the whole thing in C ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 16, 2016, at 3:21 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> First, "the interface" is slow: meaning the run time. But if you have to
>>> "reinvent" a Python API / BCL because it is slow - And do that in C. Why
>>> not just use C to begin with ?
>>>
>>> Aside from Python forcing coding guidelines on it users, it's a fine
>>> language. What it is  not though, is a good language when you need pure all
>>> out performance. But not all code needs to be fast. Sometimes, fast enough
>>> works. Probably even most of the time.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:36 PM, John Syne <john3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The benefit of Python is the easy interface to C code, which means that
>>>> when your algorithm is slow, you can reimplement that code in C but keep
>>>> the benefit of writing in a more feature rich language like Python.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 16, 2016, at 1:47 PM, fiem.arghya...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @William, I love to work with C.
>>>> But, the thing is I want to implement machine learning algorithms in
>>>> BeagleBone.
>>>> So, it is quite easier to implement them with Python or R, as their are
>>>> some
>>>> dedicated packages to analyze the data.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to