>
> *Oh, and one more thing; the IIO driver uses a top half and bottom half
> for handling interrupts, so you won’t see and added latency. All the real
> work is done in a workqueue.*
>

That's not true. The developer of the software cautions not to use the
interrupts too frequently. As it will do exactly as I stated. His words,
not mine.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:06 AM, John Syne <john3...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, and one more thing; the IIO driver uses a top half and bottom half for
> handling interrupts, so you won’t see and added latency. All the real work
> is done in a workqueue.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:12 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *First, that isn’t going to work because the ADC uses a scan loop and
>> unless you can respond to interrupts, you cannot determine when the ADC
>> conversion has completed. There is a much simpler way to do this. Simply
>> use the IIO driver and then*
>>
>
> FIrst of all, it *will* work. I've done it, and it works. Second of all,
> in continuous mode, values are put out as 32bit values. Only the first
> 12bits is the actual ADC value. The next 4 bits is the channel ID( 0 - 7 ),
> and the last 16bits reserved / unused. Thirdly, using interrupts in fast
> moving code is about as bad of an idea as using try / catch blocks in fast
> moving code. It adds code latency, and also introduces non deterministic
> behavior. This is why iio does not work fast for short data sets.
>
>
> *dd if=/dev/iio:device0 of=~/test*
>>
>
> Maybe, but it's a terrible idea if the target is flash media. The ADC's
> can, and will use up a lot of storage space, very quickly. Just using 7
> channel in one shot mode, one channel after the next. In a loop of 300k
> iterations. I was using up ~3MB/s disk space. Maxed out, and all channel
> used. The ADC's should use up ~9MB/s or more.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:06 PM, John Syne <john3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> First, that isn’t going to work because the ADC uses a scan loop and
>> unless you can respond to interrupts, you cannot determine when the ADC
>> conversion has completed. There is a much simpler way to do this. Simply
>> use the IIO driver and then read /dev/iio:device0
>>
>> For example, do:
>>
>> dd if=/dev/iio:device0 of=~/test
>>
>> Enable the iio buffer and your file will receive samples at the
>> configured speed.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 2:27 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> errr oops, I sent too soon. mmap() is fast, and can actually read from
>> the ADC faster than the ADC can update values. But, it's using the main
>> processor to do so, and if you need to do more than just read the ADC.
>> Additional processes would have to compete for processor time. So, if one
>> does want / need to read at maximum speed, it might be wise to offload the
>> main processor, by using a PRU.
>>
>> It would not matter if this were done in userspace, or kernel space.
>> It'll definitely put a load strain on the ARM processor.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:19 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> *You realize that you can read the ADC from Linux at full speed also? No
>>>> need to use the PRU. *
>>>> *Regards,*
>>>>
>>> *John*
>>>
>>> I do, because I've proven just that :) *mmap()* is dahmed fast . . .
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, John Syne <john3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You realize that you can read the ADC from Linux at full speed also? No
>>>> need to use the PRU.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 12:43 PM, TJF <jeli.freih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello PatM001!
>>>>
>>>> There's libpruio <http://beagleboard.org/project/libpruio/>, which
>>>> provides ADC sampling at full speed (200 kHz). You'll get rid of the
>>>> exeptions (and the miss readings of the sysfs driver in case of sampling
>>>> multiple channels).
>>>>
>>>> The downside: no C# binding yet. It's written in FreeBASIC/PASM and
>>>> gets shipped with a C header. You may try SWIG <http://www.swig.org/>
>>>> on the C header in order to generate a binding for your prefered language.
>>>>
>>>> If you try, please share your results, or at least report.
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to