Excerpts from Raymond Mancy's message of 2014-02-10 17:10:02 +1000:
>   Documentation: According to the guidelines, 'relevent' documentation 
>   in the source must be inclded marked with %doc. AFAICT, the only 
>   docs in the documentation folder that are included in the binary 
>   rpms are the man pages, are a recreation of the releases page from 
>   the website. Although the guidelines do talk about irrelevant docs, 
>   and what they are, I'm not sure if the rest of our docs fall into 
>   that category.

The only relevant documentation for us (that is, relevant to be shipped 
in the package as %doc) would be COPYING, and the beaker-server upgrade 
notes. We do this correctly already I believe.

>    PIE: We need to add instructions so that Beaker can make use of 
>    position-independent execution.

Not sure which guideline you are referring to here but I doubt it 
applies, since Beaker is pure Python.

> If anyone can point out any misunderstanding of the guidelines, or in 
> general anything else to add, please do.

Did you also look over the Python guidelines? I think we already adhere 
to them all.

-- 
Dan Callaghan <[email protected]>
Software Engineer, Hosted & Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Beaker-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/beaker-devel

Reply via email to