You can also set @Status("inactive") on tests that should not be run.-----Original Message----- From: James Song Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:04 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: controls DRTs Rich: My r106973 adds a checkin.tests by mistake, which failed and the number of controls checkin.tests was increased to 75. My r109211 moved this test into "detailed" and the total number of controls checkin.tests should be 74. Now all controls checkin.tests(74) pass. -James -----Original Message----- From: Richard Feit Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:59 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: controls DRTs Sorry for the late reply. I just wiped out my entire distribution and retried from scratch, and everything worked (74/74 passed). I'm not sure what was in the old tree, but I hadn't modified anything. Thanks for checking. Rich Kyle Marvin wrote: >I'm pretty close to synced up (don't have Ken's most recent checkin) >and am passing 75 out of 75 locally. > >Eddie/Rich, can you provide more info about the failing/aborting >test(s)? That might offer a clue, even though I don't have a local >repro. > >-- Kyle > >On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:04:10 -0800, Ken Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I'm clean, but my working copy is a little out of date; I've not sync'ed >>since before Thanksgiving. I'm updating now, but will be offline till >>late afternoon. I notice the CC box is either hung or has bad >>timestamps, so I have no visibility into what might be wrong.. which >>test is aborting? >> >>James/Zach, can you guys get the CC box back on its feet and help figure >>out what's going on here? >> >>thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Eddie O'Neil >>>Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:35 PM >>>To: Beehive Developers >>>Subject: Re: controls DRTs >>> >>> >>> FWIW, I just ran these locally with a clean sync and no >>>local changes and got this in the controls DRT: >>> >>> >>> [tch] TOTALS >>> [tch] ------- >>> [tch] TOTAL TESTS: 75 >>> [tch] SUCCESSES: 74 (98.67%) >>> [tch] FAILURES: 0 (0.0%) >>> [tch] ABORTS: 1 (1.33%) >>> [tch] SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) >>> [tch] VALIDATION SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) >>> [tch] TIMEOUTS: 0 (0.0%) >>> >>> [tch] INVALIDATIONS: 0 >>> [tch] SCRATCHES: 0 >>> [tch] ABANDONS: 0 >>> >>> >>>Richard Feit wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Never mind; Eddie pointed out the CC box, but this is >>>> >>>> >>>different than >>> >>> >>>>*any* of my results. I'm investigating... >>>> >>>>Richard Feit wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi all, >>>>> >>>>>I'm trying to update our version of apache-xbean.jar, which fixes >>>>>http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-72 . When I run the >>>>>controls DRT, I get the following results, which look the >>>>> >>>>> >>>same as they >>> >>> >>>>>do without the new apache-xbean.jar. Can anyone confirm >>>>> >>>>> >>>that this is >>> >>> >>>>>the expected set of results? >>>>> >>>>> [tch] TOTALS >>>>> [tch] ------- >>>>> [tch] TOTAL TESTS: 74 >>>>> [tch] SUCCESSES: 68 (91.89%) >>>>> [tch] FAILURES: 5 (6.76%) >>>>> [tch] ABORTS: 1 (1.35%) >>>>> [tch] SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) >>>>> [tch] VALIDATION SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) >>>>> [tch] TIMEOUTS: 0 (0.0%) >>>>> >>>>> [tch] INVALIDATIONS: 0 >>>>> [tch] SCRATCHES: 0 >>>>> [tch] ABANDONS: 0 >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Rich >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > >
