Thanks for the reply... I'll check out Jitsi and do a little more investigating and I'm sure I'll be back soon with more questions.
P.S.: Does Nikita still read this list or should I try to email him personally to get more details or is he busy and I should just leave him alone? On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Frédéric Barthéléry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:11:16PM +0200, Nabil Alsharif wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> > Hi, > >> For a project at school I'm trying to add voice calls to Beem via >> Jingle RTP (XEP-0167). I chose Beem because this feature is not yet >> implemented and I'm hoping to format my changes into a patch or a pull >> request for Beem once the project is completed. I also noticed the >> beem-jingle branch and that the last commit was 16 months ago. I would >> be nice to know what the state of the branch is? Why has development >> stopped? Is there a TODO list or issue tracker for that branch? > Nice to see there is still interest in the jingle development. > I will try to answer your questions. > In the jingle branch, you will find an integration of the old jingle > implementation for Smack and integration of some code from sipdroid.org to > send and receive the rtp packets. Nikita can surely tell you more on the > implementation details. > > The development has stopped because of lack of time and/or interest so > there is no TODO list. There is no special issue tracker for that branch > (because it is mainly experimental) however you can add issues on the > main bug tracker with category XMPP-Jingle. > >> I've been thinking that it might be good for me to try to implement >> Jingle File Transfer (XEP-0234), even though it is still experimental, >> so I can get a feel of how the code for Beem is layed out get a deeper >> understanding of exactly how jingle works. any thoughts? > If I had to implement Jingle now, I will also start with File Transfer > because it is really simpler than audio/video call. The jingle code in > smack is really old and was written only for audio/video, so it may be > hard to extend for other jingle applications. > An other implementation of Jingle for smack has been made by Jitsi [1], > and is in a better shape than the old implementation for smack. > You should look at it, and get inspiration from it if you want to > reimplement a Jingle application. > > [1] https://jitsi.org http://bluejimp.com/sip-communicator/api/ > >> >> Thank you all for your time and help and I hope this works. > Thank you for your interest. > > Cheers, > > -- > Da Risk > Beem Developer > http://www.beem-project.com > _______________________________________________ > Beem-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.beem-project.com/mailman/listinfo/beem-dev _______________________________________________ Beem-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.beem-project.com/mailman/listinfo/beem-dev
