Hi florent
Read K. Beck idiom on redefining = normally you MUST also redefine hash
the pattern Kent suggested was
Book>>= anBook
(self author = anBook author ) and: [self name = anBook name]
Book>>hash
self author hash bitXor: self name hash
Now most of the time I try to use sortedCollection to avoid to have
to fix the equality of an object,
SortedCollection sortBlock: [:a :b | a name > b name and.....]
On 5 août 06, at 12:56, florent trolat wrote:
Mathieu a écrit :
florent trolat a écrit :
Hi,
I've define an '=' message for an oject and I want to use this
object in
a Collection.
I've seen that 'incudes:' message use '=' or not '==' and it's
not fun
for me!
I think that '=' message is to compare two objects and '==' to
know if the two object are one!
So for me 'includes:' must use '==' or not '='...
May be I have not understand something...
Thanks to help me....
Hi florent
You can do
***********
= anObject
^anObject == self
***********
But it is not pretty so the best way is to remove = and the default
behavior of = is == (unless inherit from someone else...).
Ok I understand ... it was my job to see this, sorry...
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
