On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:48 -0700, Chris Cunningham wrote: > Ok, nice tool. In principal exact what I was looking for. > Unfortunately it doesn't support directory repositories > and it that way. > > Hi Norbert, > > Attached is a simple change set that will allow it to mostly support > directories (I've been using it personally for a while now - there are > undoubtedly places where there are holes). Basically, it removes the > protections that were put in to not use Directories. If you think > about it, using directory repositories for configurations is a really > bad idea - if you share the config with someone else, they can't get > to your repositories. Heck, if the directory is local on your machine > and you switch to another machine, they configuration isn't even > useful for yourself. > > That said, this will allow you to do it if you still want too.
Thanks, I'll give it a try. I partially agree that using directory repositories is not the best idea. But in my opinion if you have source code which isn't public it is a really bad idea to use http repositories. So our team uses diretory repositories which we sync via unison over ssh to a central server. I had a look at HttpSocket und HttpsSocket to get https repositories into monticello but I'm not the most experienced squeaker nor do I have enough time to get deep enough into it. thanks very much, Norbert _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners