On Sep 26, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Am 26.09.2008 um 12:24 schrieb Mark Volkmann:
I hope I'm not exceeding the limit for questions in one day.
Not yet ;)
I'm porting some Java code that deals with XML to Smalltalk. A Java
class has these methods.
public StartTagWAX attr(String name, Object value) ...
public StartTagWAX attr(String prefix, String name, Object
value) ...
What would be good Smalltalk names for these methods?
Here's my first guess.
attrName:value:
attrPrefix:name:value:
The way to test this is to check how it looks in a method using
this. Looks okay except that a Smalltalker probably would prefer
"attribute" to "attr".
Note that I don't really have a new to create Attr objects. I just
need data describing an attribute so I can output it.
I'm not sure I understand ... do these methods return an new
Attribute object? Or is the method writing the arguments directly?
The method writes the part of the XML corresponding to the attribute
to a stream. For example,
wax attrName: 'foo' value: 'bar'
would write ' foo="bar"' to the stream and
was attrPrefix: 'p' name: 'foo' value: 'bar'
would write ' p:foo="bar"' to the stream.
---
Mark Volkmann
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
