I am not absolutely sure, but I think CUIS translates methods to native code, instead of bytecodes, thus executing faster.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:38, John Worden <worden.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > Absolute beginner playing with smalltalk. I have a simple program that > opens a number of text files, plays with data closes files and gives a count > of things in the files. (Its actually my Squeak version of the Cincom VW > Tutorial). I have run it on Squeak, Pharo and Cuis images. What suprised me > was the difference in speeds. I haven't done tried to time it (I should do > that or at least work out how to) but Squeak and Pharo take about the same > time whereas Cuis is significantly quicker. I know its a cut down image but > the difference is remarkable. Is this to be expected? > > John > > > _______________________________________________ > Beginners mailing list > Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners > >
_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners