> Is this something which should be handled differently in the module itself?
Possibly. But what the author considers to be fatal is up to them so I wouldn’t say “should” but “could” ... that’s why Perl has eval ;-). You can go into the module code, find the “die” and change it “warn” maybe. It’d just be a mod you’d have to maintain. You could also go to cpan and offer a suggestion to the author(s) or even a patch. TIMTOWTDI On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:20 AM Lars Noodén <lars.noo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/28/19 7:33 PM, Andy Bach wrote: > > Look at eval blocks - lets you trap fatal errors from other code and not > > die/abort yourself. > > https://perldoc.perl.org/functions/eval.html > > Thanks. I went with an eval block since it was very quick to set up. > > > You can also wrie your own signal handling code > > > https://www.perl.com/article/37/2013/8/18/Catch-and-Handle-Signals-in-Perl/ > > Is this something which should be handled differently in the module itself? > > /Lars > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org > For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org > http://learn.perl.org/ > > > -- Andy Bach afb...@gmail.com Not at my desk
