On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 05:58:58PM -0700, tom poe wrote: > I copied the dirs/files to the upgrade 5.6.1, but no change, so I go, OK, > I'll make sure Pg.pm is copied over, then I'll get rid of the old one, and > this is just weird. Anyone have a thought about This?
Copying the files over manually is usually a bad idea. Even if you do manage to get all of the files (which you probably didn't, I will explain later), the binary portions are probably not going to be compatible from one version of perl to the next. perl can be compiled to be binary-compatible, but if so it should probably have also been compiled to look in the 5.6.0 directories. Regardless, have you tried installing DBD::Pg from scratch? That would be the safest and most reliable method. [other shell commands snipped] > root@aether:/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/DBD > locate DBD/Pg.pm > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/DBD/Pg.pm > root@aether:/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/DBD > exit > exit > tompoe@aether:/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/DBD > locate Pg.pm > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/DBD/Pg.pm > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/Pg.pm > tompoe@aether:/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/DBD > I'm not sure exactly what you were trying to show with your shell commands. Perhaps that DBD::Pg does exist. Some commentary would've been useful. Regardless, the .pm is only one portion of the DBD::Pg install. There is also a binary portion, probably installed in /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i586-linux/auto/DBD/Pg. You could try copying those files over as well, but, as I mentioned above, it'd be safer and more reliable to simply reinstall. Michael -- Administrator www.shoebox.net Programmer, System Administrator www.gallanttech.com -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
