on Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:43:24 GMT, James Kipp wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your help. I am going to redo the get_stats()
> function to be 'smarter', the way it is now is much to messy.
No wonder you come to that conclusion after the odd 20, dare I say,
messy answers in this thread.
Let's go back to one of your clarifications:
> when the get_stats() func is called $stats will contain something
> like > this:
> $stats = [
> [ "oracle", 6.8, 11.2 ],
> [ "ksh", 1.8, 1.2 ],
> ....etc....
> ];
> and $totals will have something like:
>
> $totals = [
> [ 15.8, 17.2 ],
> [ 3.7, 3.9 ],
> ....etc....
> ];
> so i want to end up with something like:
> @stats = (
> ["oracle", 6.8, 11.2,15.8, 17.2 ],
> ["ksh", 1.8, 1.2, 3.7, 3.9 ],
> ....etc...
>);
could this line possibly do what you want:
push @stats, [@{$stats->[$_]}, @{$totals->[$_]}]
for (0..$#$stats);
under the assumption that $stats and $totals are refs to parallel
arrays?
(Note to contributors to this thread: please remember that a reply should
*help* the OP, not confuse him/her even further ;-)
--
felix
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
