Hmmm, that's a useful work-around. I may use it, but I'm really interested in finding out what the correct invocaton of "map EXPR, LIST" would be.
Anyone know? Thanks, deb Kipp, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> had this to say, > if you wanted to keep the use warnings pragma in there you could use the CGI > carp method to send errors off to to wherever: > > # at the top of the script > use CGI::Carp qw(carpout); > # redirect STDERR > # could also send errs and warning to /dev/null > open (ERRLOG, ">/tmp/err.out") or die "can't open error file\n"; > carpout(\*ERRLOG); > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deb [mailto:deb@;tickleme.llnl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:12 PM > To: Perl List > Subject: map EXPR, LIST > > > Using > perl v5.6.1 on Solaris. > use warnings; > use strict; > > > I've got a hash of lists that I'm looping through: > > > foreach $List (sort keys %HashofLists) > { > print "Values for key \"$List\":\n"; > map print ("\t\"$_\"\n"), @{$HashofLists{$List} }; > } > > > This works just fine, except that I am getting the following complaint > when I run the program, > > print (...) interpreted as function at verify_lists.pl line 55. > > Line 55 is the "map print" line, above. > > This worked w/o complaint (I think!) back in perl 5.001, so my assumption > is that v5.6.1 now requires a syntactically different way of writing this > out? > > Since it works as expected, and I don't want the complaint to stdout/stderr, > > how would I write this such that perl will not complain? > > Thanks, > deb > > -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- There are 010 types of people in the world: those that understand binary, and those that don't. τΏτ ~ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
