I am planning to distribut my module, but am confused on what to call it.
I have a series of modules in a directory that I will call Rtf2xml. (I checked on Cpan, and don't believe this name space is taken.) I named each module by a simple name--for example Pict.pm. In the main script, I have: use Rtf2xml::Pict ... &Pict::process_pict() In the actual module, I have: package Pict; Everything works fine this way. But when I look at other modules, I notice that they use a different naming convention. My question is if I should follow this syntax: package Rtf2xml::Pict # for the actual module &Rtf::Pict::process_pict() # for calling on a subroutin in the pacage I believe that the second way provides a more distinct namespace? I *have* read the documentation on how to distribute a module, but I couldn't follow most of the jargon. Thanks Paul -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* ************************ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]