------------------------------------------------ On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:11:07 -0500 (CDT), Paul Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote: > > > Yes and no. There are multiple different implementations of threads all > > of which have some good and bad points. You will need to look more into > > them depending on your version of Perl and how complex the task is that > > you wish to accomplish. (There is also a separate mailing list for perl > > threading). > > > Do you know where this mailing list can be found? I didn't see it on the > "list of lists" (pardon the pun) at perl.org... > Its actually an iThreads list but discussion of the multiple threading models has taken place... http://lists.perl.org/showlist.cgi?name=iThreads I've often wondered why there isn't just a more general "threads" or "threading" list, maybe because none of the models is universally accepted?... http://danconia.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
