JupiterHost.Net am Mittwoch, 8. März 2006 00.29:
> >> - "\(" instead of "[(]": more readable
>
> not according to "best practicesHi JupiterHost.Net I think there are more than one "best practices", although not several books carrying this title. I can't - and don't want to - diskuss based on "According to XYZ" (missing arguments), sorry. Readability is good. Performance, as John W. Krahn added, is also good. In that case, I don't care about XYZ. > >> - no /m modifier : unnecessary without ^/$-anchors > > Still a good habit to get into according to 'best practices' (and to get > used Getting used using unused usefullness is useless in my opinion ;-) > to what it does to \A \z and ^ $ Which is (in my opinion) better to achieve by using it when appropriate and by rtfm. When everybody followed the advice "do $a to get used at it", there wouldn't be any perl one liner any more ;-) > >> - /s : may be appropriate for your html source text > > It only really affects making it easier to read by including spaces, any > spaces to match would need put in your regex. So its appropraite for any > regex that space will make clearer to understand and maintain :) I suspect you don't talk about the /s modifier here... > Sorry, I'm a huge fan of "Best Practices" Yes, obviously, seen in another post already. > I call it "the book that got > me my free mini convertable and got me a substantial promotion". Sorry, too much for my english capabilities... > but do what you like :) Thanks - you too :-) [...] Hans -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
