On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:42:51AM -0500, Rance Hall wrote: > > some mail readers are probably capable of reading the list header and > figuring it out, but I bet others don't (like mine)
I use Mutt, which allows me to list-reply, but without setting up custom configurations it doesn't use list-reply without being specifically told to do so. As such, I either give it a custom configuration, or I have to use a different method of replying than the standard reply command (using the r key for replies) if I want it to go to the list. I'll probably set up custom config for it to check for list-reply first, though then I have to figure out how to make it easy for me to skip to individual replying if/when I want to do so without having to use a group reply and delete extra recipients (such as the list and myself). Not all that big a hardship, but it seems like kind of a suboptimal way to run a mailing list. Er, that was more than I intended to say on the subject. By checking the headers, I see that you're using Thunderbird. I'm surprised that it doesn't support list-reply. Are you saying that it doesn't recognize the list-reply header at all, or that it doesn't default to list-reply when it exists, or something else entirely? -- Chad Perrin [ CCD CopyWrite | http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit." - W. Somerset Maugham -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
