> > Get in the habit of using strict and warnings -- 'use warnings' is > > subtly different from 'perl -w' and you should start good habits > > early. Upgrade if you are using an ancient version of Perl that does > > not come with warnings. > > > So would it be a conflict to use both "-w" and "strict"? > > Danny
-w and strict would not be a conflict. The precise behavior for simultaneous "-w" and "use warnings;" is not clear in my mind. They are very similar in what they provide -- the 'warnings' pragma is finer controlled than the -w option, and has different scope. It would behoove you to read perldoc perllexwarn. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
