Hi Rebecca,

    LLVM 5. 0 has been released, we are planning to release a minor release 
1.3.2 to support LLVM 4.0 and
LLVM 5.0 after beignet's LLVM5.0 patches are ready.
    Dose fedora applying 4.0 support is urgent? If not, I suggest you wait 
1.3.2 release.    
    
Thanks,
Yang Rong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rebecca N. Palmer
> Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 10:10 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Beignet] beignet and LLVM 4
> 
> Debian plans to remove LLVM 3.8 and 3.9, retaining 4.0 and 5.0 [0].
> 
> beignet 1.3.1 (currently in Debian) doesn't build with LLVM 4.0+, but beignet 
> git
> master does.
> 
> Fedora tried applying the 4.0-support patches to beignet 1.3.1, but found that
> this made several applications crash, and are now using a git snapshot [1-2].
> 
> Is such a snapshot also likely to be the best solution for Debian beignet, 
> and if so,
> should it be 'same commit as Fedora' (36f6a8b), 'current master', or some 
> other
> point?
> 
> [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873403 Anyone can
> comment there, but be aware that Debian does _not_ spam-protect email
> addresses.
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=943802
> [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=beignet&product=Fedora
> , several towards the end.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beignet mailing list
> Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
_______________________________________________
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet

Reply via email to