On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:37:03AM +0200, Loic Tortay wrote: > Therefore, we are not running fsprobe on our X4500s since it is > actually less useful than "zpool scrub" for detecting corruptions or > problems on data.
.. how does zpool scrub double-check that zpool scrub is working? The point of extra user-run testing is often to make sure that your vendor did not screw up. Of course, you are welcome to not follow advice, good or bad. Several people have commented that fsprobe doesn't check existing files. For your system binaries, you can test them using rpm -V. My new startup is planning on using md5 everywhere to provide an end-to-end check. -- greg _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
