I was just going to post the same thing, but with the HPCWire link instead.

http://www.hpcwire.com/blogs/New-China-GPGPU-Super-Outruns-Jaguar-105987389.html

A few comments:

A 42% increase (2.5TF v. 1.75TF for jaguar) is not a "wide margin".  If I did 
my math right, that represents about 7 months worth of gain on the growth curve 
for the Top500 list (peak performance growth is ~2x every 13 months).

Linpack is very forgiving of low-bandwidth networks (or PCI-x busses in this 
case).

This strikes me as a machine that will most likely never see a single 
application that runs on the full system.  There is nothing wrong with that 
per-se, but it must be taken into consideration when comparing it to machines 
that have run real production applications across the entire processor set (ie. 
Jaguar).

What this machine does do is validate to some extent the continued use and 
development of GPUs in an HPC/cluster setting.  I will admit that I have been 
very skeptic in the past as to whether GPU-based computing had any long-term 
traction.  In my defense I have seen many past examples of specialized 
computing approaches that did not survive past the first generation and 
eventually lost out to the general purpose microprocessor.  I will now admit 
that GPU technology may have a bigger long-term impact that I had originally 
imagined.

-b

> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/technology/28compute.html
> 
> --
> Prentice Bisbal
> Linux Software Support Specialist/System Administrator
> School of Natural Sciences
> Institute for Advanced Study
> Princeton, NJ
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin
> Computing
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to