On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:39 AM, Joe Landman wrote: > > If you know what you are doing, 3GB/s is so ... several years ago. > c.f. > http://scalability.org/?p=3157 >
If you scroll back Joe, The 3GB/s figure is what they posted they were happy to reach with a SSD. That's why i kept using it. > Wait, you want faster? How about this? http://scalability.org/?p=5779 > That's for the high frequency traders who need fastest possible latencies to SSD :) Let me not ask after price there as we can buy a house from that i bet :) >> >> What we know for sure is that the SSD array is going to be really >> expensive. > > So far, in this post, these are the first words that I would have to > agree with, for various values of the word "really". > >> >> In short SSD's are only interesting for latency and caching. > > ... and back to absolutes. Wrong ones, but absolutes. > > > So at some point, when its all ok to talk publicly about what we are > doing, you'll see a pretty good refutation of, well, almost everything > that was said in this post. > > And yes, my company is very self respecting. > > > > -- > Joseph Landman, Ph.D > Founder and CEO > Scalable Informatics, Inc. > email: [email protected] > web : http://scalableinformatics.com > http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster > phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 > fax : +1 866 888 3112 > cell : +1 734 612 4615 > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin > Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
