> 3) does it really save anything to put the computation in orbit? As much as I > love computing in space (particularly deep space), if you had a solar powered > conventional data center on > the ground and a fat comm pipe to those third > world countries, wouldn't that work as well? The solar plant on the ground > will see about 1/3 the solar power as one in the right orbit > (which may not > be stable, see #2), but mass to orbit is expensive, so why not put all those > solar cells to work on the earth's surface, rather than spending energy to > put them into> orbit.
Indeed. The correct location for the Exascale HPC Datacentre of the future is of course the Moon. For the very good reason that we all wanted to be astronauts as little boys and girls, right? And we all wanted to work with Barbara Bain in a skin tight jumpsuit. http://www.retronaut.com/2012/12/publicity-stills-for-space-1999-year-2-barbara-bain-in-costume-as-dr-helena-russell-md/ (for the girls read Martin Landau). Or could it just be that the PHB's get to blast off all those pesky sysadmins to the Moon and conveniently 'forget' to send the return flight? Just a six monthly Progress ship stacked with pizza and Jolt cola. The contents of this e-mail are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient you should not read, copy, retransmit or disclose its contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by email or telephone. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the views held by McLaren Racing Limited. McLaren Racing Limited | McLaren Technology Centre | Chertsey Road | Woking | Surrey | GU21 4YH | UK | Company Number: 01517478
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
