Thank you for creating the list. I have subscribed. Justin
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:43 AM, C Bergström <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the shameless self indulgence, but there seems to be a > growing trend of love/hate around MPI. I'll leave my opinions aside, > but at the same time I'd love connect and host a list where others who > are passionate about scalability can vent and openly discuss ideas. > > Despite the comical name, I've created mpi-haters mailing list > http://lists.pathscale.com/mailman/listinfo/mpi-haters_lists.pathscale.com > > To start things off - Some of the ideas I've been privately bouncing around > > Can current directive based approaches (OMP/ACC) be extended to scale > out. (I've seen some research out of Japan on this or similar) > > Is Chapel c-like syntax similar enough to easily implement in clang > > Can one low level library succeed at creating a clean interface across > all popular industry interconnects (libfabrics vs UCX) > > Real world success or failure of "exascale" runtimes? (What's your > experience - lets not pull any punches) > > I won't claim to see ridiculous scalability in most web applications > I've worked on, but they had so many tools available - Why have I > never heard of memcache being used in a supercomputer and or why isn't > sharding ever mentioned... > > Everyone is welcome and lets keep it positive and fun - invite your friends > > > ./C > > ps - Apologies if you get this message more than once. > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
