Thanks Luc for your comment. I would wait for Stephanes comment as well and
address it all together.
Mankamana
From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>
Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 8:04 AM
To: Luc André Burdet <laburdet.i...@gmail.com>,
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-06 review
Luc,
About this:
“7. Section 9.1.2 is not really exposing the problem fully. With the
topology provided, the simplest way for PE2 to receive all traffic is to simply
disable SMET route and IMET route will pull the multicast traffic.
I think the point this section is trying to make is that SMET must be enabled
because of some other router...say PE3... and because of that a *,* needs to be
generated.”
I think Figure 2 assumes that PE1 and PE2 are igmp/mld proxy capable, hence an
IMET route won’t pull any mcast as per section 8. But I agree with you this can
be explicitly mentioned.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Luc André Burdet
<laburdet.i...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 2:26 PM
To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org
<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org>
Cc: bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-06 review
Hi,
I have read this version and have some preliminary feedback;
1. There is a missing ref to ‘bum-procedures-updates’ not listed in
references.
2. Multicast Flags extcomm figure (page25) has only 31 bits per row?
3. “IGMP Membership Report” needs to be substituted/consistently named
throughout (perhaps also capitalised more uniformly)
(sometimes referred to as IGMP membership report, other times IGMP Report, and
yet other times as membership report etc.)
4. Proposed change to section 4.1.1 (6). As written, I find it does not
map very well to RFC3376’s message format.
RFC3357 s4.2 defines a MR as multiple Group Records, each with multiple Source
IPs.
Current text description doesn’t follow that grouping, describes only mapping
“multiple Source IPs to a membership Record”
Can you update to reflect Membership -> groups -> sources hierarchy of RFC3357 ?
5. SPMSI AD terminology not defined (at a minimum define/reference PMSI)
6. Is 4.1.1 (3) a MUST NOT? “In other words, the first hop PE MUST not
withdraw”
7. Section 9.1.2 is not really exposing the problem fully. With the
topology provided, the simplest way for PE2 to receive all traffic is to simply
disable SMET route and IMET route will pull the multicast traffic.
I think the point this section is trying to make is that SMET must be enabled
because of some other router...say PE3... and because of that a *,* needs to be
generated.
Regards,
Luc André
Luc André Burdet | Cisco | laburdet.i...@gmail.com | Tel: +1 613 254 4814
On 2021-01-25, 16:55, "BESS on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org"
<bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN
Authors : Ali Sajassi
Samir Thoria
John Drake
Wen Lin
Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-06.txt
Pages : 33
Date : 2021-01-25
Abstract:
Ethernet Virtual Private Network (EVPN) solution is becoming
pervasive in data center (DC) applications for Network Virtualization
Overlay (NVO) and DC interconnect (DCI) services, and in service
provider (SP) applications for next generation virtual private LAN
services.
This draft describes how to support efficiently endpoints running
IGMP for the above services over an EVPN network by incorporating
IGMP proxy procedures on EVPN PEs.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy/
There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-06
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-06
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-06
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
