Any update on this?
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:03 AM Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrhee...@amsl.com> wrote: > HI Andrew, > > We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as > editorial. > Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata > report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the > Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/). > > You may review the report at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7652 > > Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further > information on how to verify errata reports. > > Further information on errata can be found at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. > > Thank you. > > RFC Editor/rv > > > > > On Sep 22, 2023, at 1:05 AM, RFC Errata System < > rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9252, > > "BGP Overlay Services Based on Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7652 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Editorial > > Reported by: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> > > > > Section: 3.2.1 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > Transposition Offset indicates the bit position, and Transposition > > Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the > > SRv6 SID value and encoded in the MPLS Label field. The bits that > > have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > Transposition Offset indicates the bit position and Transposition > > Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the > > SRv6 SID value and put into high order bits of MPLS label field. The > > bits that have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. > > > > Notes > > ----- > > This errata reverses an editorial change that was made during the AUTH48 > phase and restores the text that came from the WG and IESG review. Refer > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15#page-10 > > > > This change was made during the AUTH48 since the "high order bits" was > already covered under various subsections of Sec 6. However, readers have > reported that there are other places in Sec 6 and Sec 5 where transposition > also occurs and that the original text was still required. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC9252 (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : BGP Overlay Services Based on Segment Routing over > IPv6 (SRv6) > > Publication Date : July 2022 > > Author(s) : G. Dawra, Ed., K. Talaulikar, Ed., R. Raszuk, B. > Decraene, S. Zhuang, J. Rabadan > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : BGP Enabled ServiceS > > Area : Routing > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
