But, Ralph, 0 * _ is 0 in J, as is 0 * __   .  So in J
it's OK to say 0 * _. is 0  .

Henry Rich 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph G Selfridge
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 11:44 AM
> To: Beta forum
> Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Another incompatibility: _ <. _.
> 
> I see _. as indefinite, unknown, etc and multiplying (or 
> dividing, and 
> several others)are still indefinite, unknown etc. So trying 
> to say that 
> 0*_. must be zero won't hold water ( what is the logical 
> value for 0*_ or 
> 0*__?) I can easily claim that _.*x must be indefinite for 
> all x so that
> _.*0 must be indefinite.
> 
> It seems to me that 0=x % _ for all x, but you must add an 
> exception, is 
> just as true for _., its still indefinite.
> 
> Trying to extend arithmetic to the Reals (i.e. including 
> infinities) has to 
> be careful.
> 
> Ralph S
> 
> 
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Mark D. Niemiec wrote:
> 
> > Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The answer should be _. for the same reason that x+_. 
> should be _. .
> >> That is, for all numeric atoms x, _. should be the answer for
> >>
> >>    x  +  _.
> >>    x  >. _.
> >>    x  <. _.
> >>    _. +  x
> >>    _. >. x
> >>    _. <. x
> >
> > The rationale behind indefinites is that they represent a value
> > which could theoretically take on any number of different values
> > in the domain, but we have no idea of determining just which one
> > is appropriate.
> >
> > In some cases, however, arithmetic involving _. CAN produce
> > non-indefinite results, when the result is totally independent
> > of the value of the indefinite. For example:
> >
> >   0 = 0 * _.        NB. because 0 = 0 * y for all y
> >   0 = _. % _        NB. because 0 = x % _ for all x (except 
> _ and __)
> >
> > By the same rationale, we should also have:
> >
> >   _ = _ >. _.       NB. because _ = _ >. y for all y
> >   1 = _ >: _.       NB. because 1 = _ >: y for all y
> >
> > (and similar for corresponding symmetrical and 
> antisymmetrical cases)
> >
> > -- Mark D. Niemiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see 
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see 
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to