On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Tom M <letter...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3) other merges (BMesh, NURBS) need to be evaluated for feasibility yet
The NURBS branch is stable and mature enough to offer a replacement for the existing NURBS tools. I'm not sure if it makes more sense to commit this first without adding much new functionality, or to wait until there are many new/improved tools. 2.5 is missing a lot of the old tools, so I'm planning to revisit a lot of those. I will have a significant chunk of time to work on this at the beginning of 2010. I'm happy to keep working on my branch, but if it's needed I'm happy to commit the 'NURBS engine' to trunk and work from that instead. -Emmanuel _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
