Of course the "this is impossible with python" can be wrong in the long term; who know what direction python will evolve in the next 2-3 years. But trying to find a python solution right now, with what we have, is impossible.
I have to agree with what someone posted earlier: if someone is convinced this (a secure solution) can be done with the existing Python 3.1, they need to code up a proof-of-concept to shut up everyone who says it can't be done. Otherwise everyone is just filling up a useful mailing list with spam. horace grant wrote: > http://www.philhassey.com/blog/tinypy-ideas/ > > """ > Embed tinypy > > * Objective: sandbox tinypy and then (as in lunatic python) build > a python module that uses tinypy for safe execution of “unknown” code > """ > > it's just an idea at the moment and not implemented but this sounds > interesting. :) tinypy could be used for drivers in the long term. > > in the short to mid term there doesn't seem to be an easy and secure > solution but in the long term all the "this is impossible with python" > seems to be wrong to me. to me it looks like in 2-3 years the whole > situation will look different (pypy, tinypy,...) and there will be > feasible solutions. > > > > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers