Okay, I have spent several hours looking into this. I do like how the framework works, however, I still haven't gotten it to actually compile anything (not even their samples, so I'm thinking I've got the framework compiled incorrectly). It also seems like this is designed to be used directly by the end programmer, rather than being plugged into another framework such as Ctest (which is what I was considering doing, as cmake is already used), but I could be wrong on that.
However, I would like to get the general mood of the developers on having a C++ testing framework. Is it proffered, acceptable but not optimal, or is a definite no (or something else). While the majority of the code is written in C (except for parts written in python), there are a few bits here and there in C++. Anyway, I appreciate your opinions. ~Leif Andersen ---------- That was easy: http://www.appbrain.com/app/net.leifandersen.mobile.android.easybutton On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 17:51, Leif Andersen <leif.a.ander...@gmail.com>wrote: > Great, thanks, that's good information to have. > > ~Leif Andersen > > ---------- > That was easy: > http://www.appbrain.com/app/net.leifandersen.mobile.android.easybutton > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 15:51, Tom M <letter...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Leif Andersen <leif.a.ander...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Okay, I'll take a look into it. The only think that I may be worried >> about >> > is the license, I'm not sure how that would work for unit testing, so >> I'm >> > not sure if the BSD license would be comparable with a GPL project. >> >> BSD, MIT, zlib, LGPL are all GPL compatible. >> >> LetterRip >> >> >> > >> > ~Leif Andersen >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
