--- On Sun, 11/21/10, Alex Combas <blenderw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not think you understand what exactly he is saying. You would think wrong. > > [SNIP] > > So in this case the "stealing" and "leaking" of the code is > not what causes > them to be sued > it is simply a matter of proof to show what the company is > doing. That's not stealing then. The third party is fully in their rights to distribute the modified version. The situation I was referring to was if someone within the same organization started distributing without consent. As stated in the FAQ, unlawful distribution doesn't trigger the GPL distribution clause (with good reasons). > The question is does the GPL apply if you are distributing > to partners and > contractors. I believe it does > but I could be wrong about that. It does, pretty much everyone on this list as said as much already. Martin _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
