On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Matt Ebb <m...@mke3.net> wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Campbell Barton <ideasma...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Aligorith and I discussed this before committing, and are aware of the >> implications. >> >> To me if you are editing floats, but have them converted to ints later >> it makes most sense (on a user level), to round them. If the GUI makes >> it unintuitive then it should be made intuitive (grid lines when >> zoomed in for example), if you want I can add this. >> > > Rounding them to whole numbers, sure, I totally agree, and if floor() works > better then I'm all for it. But when animating bool values it makes perfect > sense that as soon as your curve crosses from 0 to 1 (not 0 to 0.5), the > value is switched on. Same goes for integer values, animating my curve from > 4.0 to 4.51 should not switch the value to 5. > > cheers > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >
I totally agree, < 1 == false and >= 1 == true is how I always thought it worked. Dan _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers