Hi, I think this is about Cycles, Blender itself doesn't need boost. I don't know if anyone has compiled Cycles on Fedora with that boost version, but if you have a compile error related to boost it may be there's a small code tweak necessary for that version. I'm using boost 1.46 here.
Brecht. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Muhamad Faizol Abd. Halim > <faizol.blen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> has anyone been able to compile on Fedora 14 (with boost 1.44)? > > I assume you mean compile blender? > > I've had success building up to version 2.57b with reverse patches for > Python 3.1 compatibility. Never worried about the boost version before > but I guess version 1.44 would be correct. > > The source has changed enough for 2.58 that my reverse patches no > longer apply properly and I haven't investigated whether it will be a > simple fix or not. > > If you're interested in trying out my 2.57b package I can upload them > somewhere... > > Thanks, > Richard > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers