Hi pete! We need to look into the stalling. I understand that the current implementations can potentially stall the execution of the new system. We need to verify if these nodes will only used near input nodes. If this is the case it should be possible to stall the execution. The user won't see the difference.
I also have "nodes with constant output", perhaps an idea to use it for the coverage node. (I want to experiment this with the LogLum algorithm) Jeroen Original Message: ----------------- From: pete larabell xgl.asyl...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:36:39 -0500 To: bf-committers@blender.org, bf-...@blender.org, lukas.toe...@googlemail.com, j.bak...@atmind.nl Subject: 2.60 feature(s) Also, what about jbakker's Compo? These nodes (all 3) require full buffer to operate, and would stall the whole execution branch they are in... Anyone care to offer advice on when these rightfully should get submitted? Cheers! Peter -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology - http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers