> So are you saying the quaternions are normalized on keyframes and they > drift during interpolation?
Let me try to clear up some confusion. In general, quaternions used for rotations are only considered "valid" if they are normalized. I'm not sure if mathematically they need to be normalized to be applied properly, but regardless, when a quaternion rotation is applied, conceptually you are applying (and perhaps literally you need to apply) its normlized version. That is _not_ the issue I'm talking about here. Blender already does this correctly, as can be seen from the fact that even unnormalized quaternions in the n-panel result in consistent and valid rotations in the affected object/bone. This is _not_ at issue. The issue is that quaternions in Blender are not interpolated by SLERPing or SQUADing (which result in normalized quaternions). Instead they are just interpolated by the typical interpolation mechanics in the f-curves editor, which nearly always results in the intermediate quaternion values being unnormalized. This is not a problem per se. Again, blender applies un-normalized quaternion rotations appropriately. But it _does_ mean that interpolation between significantly different rotations results in the undesirable effect I illustrated in the blend file I posted up-thread. In previous versions of Blender, where the n-panel quat values were auto-normalized, fixing this was trivial for the animator to do. They simply inserted a keyframe or two in-between (as illustrated in the monkey on the right in the up-thread blend file). Since those key frames would automatically have normalized values, it fixed the interpolation issues. In fact, it was so transparent that most animators don't even realize they need to do that, since breakdown key frames usually get placed eventually anyway. But as things are now, animators would first need to be aware of and understand the issue (which is esoteric enough that it's even hard to explain on a developer list like this, no?), _and_ they would need to take the time to manually tweak keyframe values to be roughly normalized. This is not a good situation, and it is about as far from user-friendly as you can get. --Nathan On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Dahlia Trimble <dahliatrim...@gmail.com> wrote: > So are you saying the quaternions are normalized on keyframes and they > drift during interpolation? I wonder if blender is interpolating the > quaternions used to animate, or interpolating something else like bone > matrices and just displaying an interpolated quaternion but not using it > for animation? > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Nathan Vegdahl <ces...@cessen.com> wrote: > >> Hi Brecht, >> You are right that it appears there are a lot of releases with this >> regression! I'm not sure how I didn't notice before. Guess I wasn't >> animating anything with large rotations. >> >> It appears the regression was introduced in version 2.56. Versions >> 2.55 and earlier behave as desired. >> >> 2.4x and earlier _do_ auto-normalize (I just tested). In the 2.4x >> series quats are displayed as eulers in the n-panel, so you have to >> set keyframes and look at the values of the keys in the Ipo editor to >> see the actual quat values. Try, for example, keying a bone unrotated >> on frame 1, then rotated 180 degrees on frame 21. On frame eleven >> it's clear that the values given by the Ipo curves are not normalized. >> However, if you move to frame 11 and set a key, the inserted keys are >> normalized. >> >> This is a highly desirable behavior, because it keeps quaternion >> values from drifting and causing rotation speed issues with >> interpolation. >> >> Perhaps we could just normalize quaternion values upon inserting >> keyframes? That is the primary use-case here. >> >> --Nathan >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Brecht Van Lommel >> <brechtvanlom...@pandora.be> wrote: >> > Hi Nathan, >> > >> > I tried manually typing in non-normalized values in the N key >> > transform panel in the 3d view, and rotating objects/bones after that >> > with transform, but could not see it auto-normalize the values in any >> > version I tested (2.49, 2.57, 2.60, 2.62). >> > >> > Probably I'm misunderstanding something, but I can't find any traces >> > of this feature. >> > >> > Brecht. >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Nathan Vegdahl <ces...@cessen.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, I wrote to the list about this before but received no response. >> >> >> >> I don't know when this was changed, but quaternion rotations for >> >> objects and bones in Blender are no longer auto-normalized for the >> >> user. I am frustrated that a release (2.62) made it out the door with >> >> this being the case, as it substantially harms the practicality of >> >> animating with quaternions. It is not "incorrect" behavior per se, so >> >> I am hesitant to file a bug report. But it is something that needs to >> >> be changed. >> >> >> >> I think we either need to revert behavior back to how it was before >> >> (quaternions being auto-normalized in the transform panel), or find >> >> another solution. But as things are right now, quaternions are >> >> impractical to animate with in many circumstances (especially doing >> >> blocking on characters involving large rotations). I will be happy to >> >> provide a technical explanation of why that is the case, but at the >> >> moment I am swamped trying to finish my rigging DVD. >> >> >> >> I just want to make sure this doesn't slip into the next release as >> >> well! It is a serious regression. >> >> >> >> --Nathan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Bf-committers mailing list >> >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > Bf-committers@blender.org >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
