On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Brecht Van Lommel <brechtvanlom...@pandora.be> wrote: > Premul for float and key for byte images could work.
Just in the interest of consistency, if we are going with "Premultiplied" naming convention, can we roll with the inverse of "Unpremultiplied" and apply it consistently? I checked in with Mr. Selan and he suggested that "Unpremultiplied" as consistent. Mr. Gritz uses[1] the TIFF convention of "Associated" and "Unassociated" convention. I'm open to whatever naming convention we rest on, and only hope we can apply it consistently throughout the interface. In particular, the sidebar panels should likely list "Premultiplied" and the node conversion should reference "Premultiplied" and "Unpremultiplied."[2] The "Color Unpremultiply" term should probably be re-evaluated to avoid confusion, as it is an order of operations event, and the current label is far to close to the other terms which can only amount to greater confusion. Blender needs to take whatever path is most healthy for it, but we can at least aim to apply the terminology consistently. With respect, TJS [1] http://lists.openimageio.org/pipermail/oiio-dev-openimageio.org/2011-April/004193.html [2] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.openimageio.devel/1406 _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers