On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 3:08 AM, walid shouman <eng.walidshou...@gmail.com> wrote: > soc-2013-meshdata_transfer is under active developement and isnt so far > from being finished and merged.
I'd consider this a special case, the branch was created, a lot of work was done, then removed and redone - the history has a lot of noise. Most of the work is in one file which is currently quite small (~500 LOC), so I think this can be committed as a patch and its no big deal if the history for each rev isn't maintained. > On Nov 2, 2013 5:29 PM, "Campbell Barton" <ideasma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Heres my first pass at listing branches to exclude, >> >> On the wiki page there are some details about why branches are >> selected to be excluded. >> >> > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Proposals/MigrationToGit#Branches_to_Exclude >> >> >> If you rather your branch is included, reply to this mail - but keep >> in mind this means blenders git repository will increase in size and >> everyone who checks out Blender will (by default) be downloading the >> branch too. >> So if this is project from years ago that was never merged, we better >> just keep the subversion as an archive. >> >> (rough guess - if we include all branches the repository would >> increase from 260mb to 600-800mb) >> ... but I cant test this, my system runs out of memory creating a git >> repo with all branches. >> >> -- >> - Campbell >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers -- - Campbell _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers