Sounds good to me! Good luck, Antony. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Sergey Sharybin <sergey....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, so think the plan then would be: > > - Jeffrey's builder goes to a deserved retirement (so Jeffrey can wipe the > bloody windoze from his machines ;) > - Antony finishes his work on updating environment for gcc-4.9 > - Once it's ready (no pressure in here, that's hell of annoying work) we > deploy it to the same machine as msvc builds, so nobody's laptop is > stressed with the load > > Sounds like a plan to everyone? > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jeffrey H <italic.rendezv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Feel free to get rid of mine. My MinGW builder never successfully built. > > JesterKing said he got his buildbot working locally, but I could never > > recreate that. I could get my local builds working, but never buildbot's. > > > > I'm not running Windows these days because I discovered I could ditch it > > entirely for my school work (and potentially for commercial work, too). > > That being said, I still have a working partition of Windows 7 that I can > > make into a builder again if I need to. Marijn's builders somewhat took > > over and I was never needed once we switched over to MSVC2013 because > > legacy 2008 was not supported by the project anymore. > > > > I am on winter break for another week and a half and won't have access to > > my workstation till I get back, but if you have any requests, please let > me > > know. > > > > Also, thanks to the developers for the opportunity to build for you > while I > > could. It was certainly an experience and gave me a taste of your world > > without actually learning a language. > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Sergey Sharybin <sergey....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > if it's matter of machine we can move buildbot to the same machine as > > > official builder are. Which is quite simple for you :) > > > > > > But why do we have two mingw slaves? Can we leave only one? > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Antony Riakiotakis <kal...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Probably one of the slaves was my laptop but it's not idle enough to > > > > act as buildslave. > > > > > > > > Side note - I am preparing an upgrade to a MinGW-w64/gcc/4.9.2 > > > > seh-posix based build for our supported platform. > > > > > > > > On 16 January 2015 at 00:02, Sergey Sharybin <sergey....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > There are two mingw64 slaves which were online for quite some time > > now > > > > (at > > > > > least few months). > > > > > > > > > > Are they gonna to be maintained or we can hide them and stop trying > > to > > > > > schedule builds on them? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Bf-committers mailing list > > > > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > > > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Bf-committers mailing list > > > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bf-committers mailing list > > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > > > -- > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers