Adding to Sergey's comments, >From the meetings I've attended, these aren't big-picture design discussions which others would feel left out from. Its quite mundane scheduling of each developers weekly tasks.
Of course its always possible to touch on interesting topics - so better do in public room. If it's too noisy & disrupting #blendercoders - we could always move to a different room, announcing in #blendercoders if people like to join. On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Sergey Sharybin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just to state the obvious. the "closed" nature of those meetings did not > happen due to attempts to isolate anyone. At the early days we were having > long (2+ hours) meetings, discussion and trying to lay down strong core > concepts. That wouldn't be efficient at all to occupy public channel for > such amount of time and ask everyone else to stay silent. Besides, they > were never secret, everyone knew about them. > > Nowadays we've got all core designs in place, we know exactly where each > team is going to, so meetings are much shorter now. So we can totally > occupy #blendercoders with those meetings without worrying that we are > silencing everyone else for too long. > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Julian Eisel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Meeting agrees we don't like to do planning behind closed-doors and to >> > to move future meetings into #blendercoders >> > So others can more easily be involved in 2.8x development. >> Good to hear! Was pretty disappointed about the closed 2.8 meetings. >> Volunteers weren't invited either, as if you didn't want any to work >> on 2.8... >> Anyway, I definitely support the move to #blendercoders :) >> >> On 25 July 2017 at 20:02, Mike Erwin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Campbell Barton <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Meeting agrees we don't like to do planning behind closed-doors and to >> >> to move future meetings into #blendercoders >> >> So others can more easily be involved in 2.8x development. >> >> >> > >> > Yes!!! An open development process is one of our greatest advantages. >> > >> > Mike Erwin >> > musician, naturalist, pixel pusher, hacker extraordinaire >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > > > -- > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers -- - Campbell _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
