Hi, I added two rendered pictures (153th frame) - http://blender.it4i.cz/rendering/the-daily-dweebs. You can see what is difference between blender's motion blur and embree's motion blur. But I think the article https://embree.github.io/papers/2017-HPG-msmblur.pdf from embree looks very nice.
I don’t know If somebody works on improvement of the motion blur in Blender Cycles? I could look at on this feature. Thanks. Best regards Milan -----Original Message----- From: Bf-committers [mailto:bf-committers-boun...@blender.org] On Behalf Of Brecht Van Lommel Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 7:46 PM To: bf-blender developers <bf-committers@blender.org> Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] The Daily Dweebs: Performance comparison of w/o Motion Blur on Haswells That render time increase at the end is odd. The fact that it happens with Embree but not BVH4 should give a clue, but I'm not familiar with the implementation. It's also odd that Embree MB is faster. Maybe all the particles are separate objects? In the native Cycles BVH without motion blur, those would have their transform applied. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jaros Milan <milan.ja...@vsb.cz> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make some comparison of w/o Motion Blur (BVH4 vs EMBREE-BVH8): > > http://blender.it4i.cz/rendering/the-daily-dweebs/ > > Do you know why the rendering time increases from 907/908 frame? > (particles, ....) > > Thanks. > > Milan Jaroš > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
