Thank you for confirming standard practice. I was getting a bit giddy about ripping and stripping some code and thought, gee, would be nice to trim that off the top :) wink and a nod.
Additionally there are some scripts that have owners copyright only; expect those will be of limited use/distribution. P.S. good to see mail list back in operation. On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 3:05 PM Bassam Kurdali <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Brecht, I like this simple rule. That way even if you only have > one file (and don't know where it came from) you can still know the > license. > Bassam > On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 20:26 +0100, Brecht Van Lommel wrote: > > The convention is to always use the full license header when the code > > is > > under that license, regardless of the size of the file. > > > > There's no alternative shorter header that we use, better to keep the > > rule > > about license headers simple & clear. > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:57 AM Jim Bates <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > seen a few files w/o header, and some that it's close to 10% of the > > > script. > > > > > > my question is: can this be treated as an external link/ref so not > > > an > > > inline block of comments? > > > > > > This may have been brought up before but I'm just getting back to > > > Blender > > > "add-on" stuff. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bf-committers mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
