Im just waiting for a BGGDown thread to get locked. On Sunday, January 13, 2013 10:22:18 PM UTC-5, kinwolf wrote: > > The problem right now is with the content of the database, not a hardware > failure(a bgg admin posted what the problem is in another thread.) That's > why it's stupid for people to say failover DB would be the solution. When > there is bad data in a DB, it gets replicated just like good data, so your > replica is just as useless as the main DB. > > On Sunday, 13 January 2013 22:12:00 UTC-5, ThatSteveGuy wrote: >> >> Don't you think the failover issue is more likely to be one of hardware? >> I don't think the geek is sitting on extra servers to run a failover >> database. >> >> From what I know of Aldie, if he could make this site available with no >> downtime he would. I'm sure no one who invests as much time in a website >> as he does enjoys having a bunch of armchair quarterbacks jump on this >> message board every time there's an issue to explain just how easily it >> could be fixed if they were in charge. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/Lhlp-nDsA_QJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
