Live In Relationship


Cohabitation (also called Live In relationship) is an arrangement 
whereby two people decide to live 
together on a longterm or permanent basis in an emotionally and/or 
sexually intimate relationship. Here an unmarried couple lives together 
in a long-term relationship that resembles a marriage. Today this 
concept is hotly debated in India. 

The virtues and vices of this arrangement are naturally contested 
vis-a-vis marriage. Marriage is generally defined as a social union or 
legal contract between people that creates kinship. It is an institution
 in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are 
acknowledged in a variety of ways.The different facets of marriage 
include legal, social, emotional, economical, spiritual, and religious. 
The act of marriage usually creates normative or legal obligations 
between the individuals involved. It is usually recognized by the State,
 a religious authority, or both.

Yet despite its wider ambit, there are many people who come forth as 
votaries of cohabitation in preference to marriage. I present here a few
 facts on the basis of which I find myself being an ardent supporter of 
marriage as an institution as opposed to Live-in relationship--

1. Life, all said and done, is a compromise. No one has complete control
 on things and situations around. This includes the choice to have a 
perfect and/or ideal mate. We would all like to have a person as our 
life-partner who is perfect in our eyes in all possible aspects. But is 
it actually possible? Isn't it only a wishful thought? And are we 
ourselves perfect? 

This means that if we want to live the best possible life, we need to go
 for suitable compromises at every step. This also includes marriage. 
So, if one finds a person suitable enough for oneself, one might as well
 go for a married relationship instead of opting for a Live-in 
relationship.

2. Marriage has as much an option of devolution as a Live-in 
relationship has. The only difference is that marriage being some kind 
of socio-legal contract, it naturally needs a formal procedure to be 
adopted before separation takes places. But at the same time, does it 
not also ensure many of the rights of the marriage partners as well. 

Instead in a Live-in relationship, each of the partner is entitled only 
to that extent which they have agreed upon in black and white. And one 
can very well understand how impractical it is to assume that an 
unmarried couple would be going for all kinds of written agreements 
while they are in an intimate relationship. Neither would the two have 
that much skill and background to come up with legal agreements not 
would the situations make it easy for the two to go for such 
formalities.

Thus both the partners would find themselves devoid of any legal 
guarantees and rights once the relationships sours and the two are 
thinking of parting their ways. In such situations, both or at least one
 of them would invariably feel cheated in a big way over the entire 
episode

3. Today divorce is not a very complicated process (and if it is so, 
then we must get it simplified) and hence to get rid of relationships 
that are difficult to be carried forth one can always choose the method 
of divorce. Hence, Live-in relationship and marriage are very similar in
 nature except the robustness and socio-legal strength of a marriage 
vis-a-vis Live-in relations

4. No one knows how events will take shape in future. In all such 
situations, if one of the partner starts developing all kinds of 
problems and complications of physical and financial nature, then the 
institution of marriage gives at least some kind of security and even in
 the case of divorce, there is a proper compensation.

Instead a Live-in relationship makes such a partner completely helpless 
and he/she gets reduced to sheer mercy of the other partner, where the 
probability of such partner leaving the other in a lurch is always 
fairly high

5. The most affected persons are the children. In marriage, the children
 feel secure mentally and socially and even in divorce, they have some 
kind of social approval. The Live-in relationship has huge emotional 
price on these young children who find themselves very awkwardly placed

6. Same is the situation of other family members. They do not feel 
themselves having as much right and authority in a Live-in relation 
couple as they do in the midst of a married couple, who have a social 
sanction as well
Summing
 it up, it seems to me that Live-in relationship (or Cohabitation) is 
nothing but a baser and distorted version of marriage having all the 
drawbacks, burdens and problems of a married life but having none of its
 guarantee and security.



Dr Nutan Thakur,

Editor,

People's Forum,

Lucknow

# 94155-34525



Reply via email to