On 15 Apr 2008, at 11:48 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, at 02:28PM, "Adam R. Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, at 02:09PM, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED] >> > wrote: > >>> As has been said here many times by now, the old URL fields are not >>> supported anymore. They are treated just as string fields. >>> >>> Again: you should drag to the file icon view in the side pane. >> >> Depending on the bibliography requirements, that may not be >> sufficient. If you're dealing with a type and/or style that >> requires the URL field to be printed out, you'll need to copy the >> link back to the URL field. If you add those frequently, a script >> hook that fires on "Add File or URL" might be worth setting up to >> copy the link to the URL field. > > Thinking about this a bit more, maybe it would make sense to copy > the first non-file: URL dropped on a reference to the URL field if > URL is a required/optional field for that type? I know I'd find the > current behavior annoying if I was adding a bunch of web citations. > > -- > adam
That makes sense, and I've already added it. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
