On 1 Jun 2008, at 8:35 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > On May 31, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Simon Spiegel wrote: > >> A followup: As I said, I don't know the details of the APA style, but >> from a first glance, the examples I saw on the web don't look >> dramatically different from biblatex's authoryear-comp style. So you >> definitely wouldn't have to start from scratch but could start with >> an >> existing style. And even if bigger changes were necessary, contrary >> to >> when you hack .bst files you'd actually had a chance to understand >> what's going on. > > I asked because the APA style is complicated enough to have its own > book: > > http://books.apa.org/books.cfm?id=4200061 > > and I've been told by various users that apacite/apa.cls is the only > acceptable solution; apparently apalike doesn't cut it. Granted, the > entire 400+ pages isn't dedicated to bibliography, but it has a bunch > of weird rules that would be time-consuming to implement correctly. > > For the OP's problem, I'd second Alex's suggestion of (ab)using the > note field as the easiest way, providing the result fits the style/NIH > requirements. > > -- > adam
You can even make it into a script hook so it's done automatically. There is a sample script hook for auto-filling a field in the Help and the Wiki which should be not too difficult to adapt. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
