On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:46 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:

> On 01/22/09 15:40, "Adam M. Goldstein" <a.m.goldst...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Also---I wonder, is it time to up the version number by more than . 
>> 01,
>> to, say, BD 1.4.0?
>
> I think we were only changing the major version number when support  
> for an
> OS version is dropped, so 1.4.0 should be accompanied by dropping  
> support
> for Tiger.  I'm not sure that there's any compelling reason to do  
> that,
> since very little of the code is 10.5-only.
>

OK, that's excellent---there really is a discipline to this! Of  
course, that makes sense, now that I think of it; the Panther only  
version is 1.2.xx, something I see every time I go to the home page.

So, that answers that question.

-Adam
------------------
Adam M. Goldstein PhD, MSLIS
--
agoldst...@iona.edu
a.m.goldst...@mac.com
http://www.iona.edu/faculty/agoldstein
--
(914) 637-2717
--
Dept of Philosophy
Iona College
715 North Avenue
New Rochelle NY 10801


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to